The Petition Numbers

Our Facebook Group was formed on 18th May 2022 the Petition launched on 29th May; keep sharing the petition link.

Reasons folks are giving for signing – a selection

Because its green belt. The loss of that land is not good for the environment and wildlife. Also not good for the over development of Brentwood as too much congestion and pollution. Go build on brown land and stop ruining the natural habitat to so many wildlife animals and different trees that are flourishing there.

Jennifer

It is a lovely Enclave of Wild life , including Adders and Badgers, and people travel miles to see the New Foals every year. My neighbour and friend has has planning rejected several times because his plans will down grade the sight of the estate , and yet you will throw up 260 house full of all sorts probably with minimal car parking.

Mark

We cannot afford to lose our Open spaces or woodland not just from an ecological position but a health and mental health position. Houses mean extra traffic on the roads, congestion and pollution. Doctors surgeries and dentists are closing their books because they are at capacity so where will these new patients get registered? Schools, do they have room available to accommodate an influx of new students?

Rebecca

Already far too much congestion along Doddinghurst Road & Ongar Roads throughout the day and quite simple the infrastructure is SHOCKING over a month to get an appointment with a doctor!! NO NHS dentists!!! One supermarket?? Come on… it is ridiculous even suggesting it!!!

Amy

Disgraceful attempt to squeeze housing into an over populated area, increasing noise and pollution in the area from the A12 with the loss of the trees screening the area. No new doctors, schools will be built and the roads are already gridlocked.

David

The borough’s infrastructure cannot take any more homes in quantity like this. You cannot get a doctor or dentist as it is. Vehicles in Doddinghurst Road would be adding to an already congested Ongar Road and High Street.

Peter

Part of the beauty of Pilgrims Hatch and surrounding areas is the nature and greenery. Both my children enjoy walking and seeing the horses and wildlife where the proposed site is, something that is fun and free and educational for them to do, which is very rare to find these days. Plus, our local schools are already over demanded, the traffic in Brentwood is laughable with how atrocious it is and this development will make it far worse, along with noise pollution.

Kelly

The infrastructure in the surrounding areas cannot cope with this number of additional houses, roads are already busy enough and all schools in the area fully populated. Additional 300 vehicles on the road from these developments alone?

Paul

I see this field each day and every day I see an array of wildlife enjoying the field, it attracts so many species of wildlife, flora and fauna, badgers, so many species of birds, including even herons! And I have even seen our beloved endangered hedgehogs. The environmental impact will be devastating to Brentwood, reducing our air quality, by taking away another green space. The amount of extra cars on the road from the new homes would create even more pollution and even heavier traffic, adding more pressure to our already overloaded infrastructure and local services. The Ongar and Doddinghurst Roads are already gridlocked most parts of the day. It will not only have a detrimental affect on our environment but will also affect peoples mental health. We need our green spaces.

Lisa

The total and inevitable destruction of all open land in all towns. The removal of spaces, whether private or public, that people can see and enjoy the openess, whether they want to or not. The fact that it is there, no houses, no industrial buildings, just what it is, nature, to be enjoyed. The clear objective of developers putting profit over the health, both physical and mental, and completely ignoring the well-being of anybody that lives in these towns. Wildlife being eradicated for the rest of time in these areas, and never to return. And clearly the further ramifications caused by the strain on the schools, medical services, police and other services that clearly cannot cope at this time. I fear that this town, like many others will be engulfed by the going cancer that is London in the coming years.

Peter

The roads around this particular area are already very congested during the rush hour and school hours making it difficult for people travelling into Brentwood from Pilgrims Hatch, Doddinghurst & Kelvedon Hatch. An additional 400 cars would make this an absolute nightmare. Any commuters living this side of Brentwood trying to get to either Shenfield or Brentwood Stations in the morning already have a difficult enough journey. This will just gridlock this side of town. I also object to the loss of yet another green area. A lot of people get enjoyment from seeing the horses on these fields.

Jackie

Building on pasture and wood land untouched to wildlife for years, if ever. Badger and Fox sets are on the land and have seen a Muntjac running around. Birds that come into our garden nest in the trees and, i suspect, the newts that lay eggs and spend spring in my pond live there during the winter. In a time when changes in the environment are affecting wildlife species throughout the world this shows why government and local authorities really don’t care about this issue.

Neil

We don’t have the infrastructure for that many more houses! Our schools are full, you can’t get to see a doctor, the road are always congested. We can’t take all those extra houses. This is the first I’ve heard about this development and it’s on my doorstep!

Rowena

If it goes ahead this planned development will be disastrous for all living in the local area, replacing space providing enjoyment with an environment which puts impossible strain on a massively overstretched local infrastructure.

Douglas

This is green belt land. We chose to live here because of the open green spaces. The infrastructure is not there to support the current residents in the area let alone another 200 homes. Due to the number of residents the local GP surgeries have so many patients on their books the wait time to speak to your Dr is over 3 weeks, dentists are not accepting new patients including current residents, the roads in the surrounding area become gridlocked on a regular basis, there are not enough spaces for children to attend local nurseries, pre schools, schools.

Nicki

The roads around this area are already congested especially Doddinghurst and Ongar Roads around school times. It’s extremely difficult to get a doctors appointment at present, where are all these additional households going to get registered. The infrastructure can’t cope with all the additional planned dwellings.

Mike

There is already an unhealthy amount of traffic congestion on the Ongar and Doddinghurst Roads, which can come to a stand still. Our doctor surgeries in particular, are at full stretch with long waiting lists for appointments. Our schools are also under pressure. I feel our infrastructure can’t cope with additional population.

Ann

Increased traffic and congestion, knocking down of healthy trees, building on land that is home to wildlife and also greenbelt land. Extra strain on local GP surgeries, and schools.

Stacey

I object to the cutting down of a well established woodland that has lots of species of trees, plants, animals, insects and birds that live there including our badgers. It is rich with biodiversity. The fact that it helps with noise pollution and air pollution something that will become even worse for us living here and for any new residents. Natural habitats such as these should be cherished not ripped down. The wild fields the other side of the A12 are also rich with biodiversity including badgers and different wild plant species, we should be protecting wild meadows in our towns. Both sites also have other problems including but not limited to dangerous proposed entrances to the sites on a busy blind corner of Doddinghurst Road, the lack of schools for the proposed houses – schools are already oversubscribed in this area, the lack of doctors and the increased traffic and cut throughs that this will create.

Natalie

The impact it will have on our health and the environment is unimaginable. The roads are already congested and there isn’t enough doctors and dentists to support those who live here already.

Lisa

The area belongs to the wildlife, the trees and fields help to suck some of pollution caused by the A12. The traffic is already horrendous, parking is a nightmare, the roads were not designed for this many cars without adding at least another 800 on top of this. There other other sites in Brentwood that have been waiting for planning permission for years, that have already been concreted over, focus on those and not destroying wildlife.

Chloe

Pollution, wildlife, trees, congestion of traffic even more than it is now. Doctors, schools.

Elaine

Traffic will be horrendous, more pollution, fumes etc not good for our health. These fields are a haven for our wildlife, keep our green spaces for local people to view.

Joanne

More pollution, strain on schools, surgeries, wildlife being destroyed, Brentwood cannot cope with the population it already has.

Angela

I object due to the massive negative effect on the biodiversity of the area if these small pockets are built on. I object to the lack of infrastructure in place in Brentwood to deal with any more traffic or people, schools, doctors, dentists, roads, supermarkets etc. The negative affect on the already dangerous air quality. The loss of natural calming beauty in a world where we should be adding more not taking it away. The already ridiculous drainage and sewage issues. The badger sets, the bats, the deer the green and blue corridor that local wildlife would lose and the obvious disregard for greenbelt which is vital for future generations. The noise pollution from the a12. The aesthetics of the area.

Philip

The impact on wildlife is outrageous and more traffic in an already over congested area will be horrific. Local infrastructure i.e. schools doctors surgery’s etc etc is insufficient and added parking insufficient. Pollution damage to local peoples health is a large factor too.

Joanne

Legal Letter Submitted

Decorative picture, to go with legal letter having been submitted, showing a lady with an "I Object" banner standing in front of 2 horses.

Having secured legal representation due to some kind donations, our lawyers have now submitted their Letter of Representation. The letter covers 11 pages of detailed legal arguments identifying many ways in which the Planning Application falls short of meeting the policies stated in the Local Plan. The first point that the Solicitors establish is that planning should only be approved if the application accords with the policies in the Local Plan. They continue to explain how the following Local Plan policies are either not met, or are at risk of not being met:

  • NE03 – Arboriculture / Landscaping,
  • NE01 – Wildlife and Habitat Protection / Protected Species,
  • MG04 – Health,
  • BE12 – Transport / Infrastructure,
  • BE08 – Strategic Transport Infrastructure,
  • NE08 – Air Quality,
  • BE14 – Noise,
  • BE05 – Drainage,
  • NE09 – Flood Risk.

You can view the letter in full below (we have redacted references to the solicitors we have used):

Continue reading “Legal Letter Submitted”

Ideas On What To Say In An Objection

An Objection Letter

Image for illustration only of somebody making an objection by holding an I Object placard by a horses field.

The objection letter below was written by one of our committee members. If we are to get those making decisions on our side it better that you use it to inspire your own thoughts than simply cut and paste it Maybe simply pick your hottest topic and create your own summary?

You can view our countdown clock here.

If you already know how to object click here to jump to the example objection.

How to Object

To view the application you need to visit:

Once there, enter the Application Number which is 24/00864/FUL and spend a leisurely week or so viewing all 132 Documents, 7 Constraints and 1 Related Case!

How to Comment or Object

You can either register your comments online or in writing.

  • Using the link above click on ‘Comments’ and follow the instructions (see Guidance Notes below on the ‘rules’ you must follow).
  • Alternatively you can send a letter to
    The Planning Officer,
    Town Hall,
    Ingrave Road,
    Brentwood,
    CM15 8AY.

Objection to Planning Application 24/00864/FUL

From: [Name & Address]

Email: [Email address]

I object to this application on numerous grounds but, more importantly I also object to the dishonest way in which R16 was added to the Local Plan as though it were a single parcel of land.  A parcel of land that had no single distinctive characteristic.  It has not been a contiguous piece of land since the A12 was built and, since that time, it has developed into two discrete environments.  One a wet woodland with great species diversity of both flora & fauna, the other a natural pasture that, being unmanaged by man, has also developed a rich ecology.

On specific matters I object because of:

Preference to using Green Field rather than Grey/Brown Field

There remain many sites that are not being developed such as the old garage on Ingrave Road and the council should be persuading developers to use these eyesore sites rather than such a pleasant amenity such as this.  Indeed there also appear to be many completed developments that are still failing to sell.  Developers love green field sites because they are the cheapest to develop and yet command the same retail prices.   The council should not consider any Green field developments until all Grey/Brown sites are developed and sold.

Air Quality

The A12 running adjacent to the proposed development is hugely polluting as evidenced by the adjacent areas being within an AQMA.  Although current trends suggest that CO pollution will be reducing, NO2 is probably not since Freight continues to be dominated by Diesel.  Furthermore Particulate Matter is likely to be increasing as the proportion of heavier Electric cars grows.  As well as the A12 being a major source, though, increases in local traffic will exacerbate this.

It is also worth noting that the pasture is a highly efficient absorber of Carbon, certainly more so than maintained grassland, since being ‘tall pasture’ it has long roots that die back building up organic matter in the soil as the grass is grazed and then regrows in a virtuous cycle.

I believe that a full spectrum Air Quality report should be undertaken at a time that is representative of true traffic levels rather than those taken during Lockdown or the immediate period after when homeworking was still widespread.

Traffic

At peak hours, exiting Doddinghurst Road onto Ongar Road (particularly in the morning rush) is already extremely difficult since the Ongar Road traffic dominates the traffic flow.  Additional developments further up Doddinghurst Road and this new potential development will only add to the carnage.

Before agreeing to allow this to happen, we need to be assured that traffic surveys that have been undertaken to justify the development were taken at a time not affected by:

  • lockdowns,
  • the time in the immediate aftermath of the main COVID emergency when Homeworking was the norm,
  • school holidays (including Brentwood School which has a significant impact on local traffic levels), or
  • unusually prolonged weather conditions that would tend to suppress traffic (e.g. snow).

Local Services

With increasing levels of infill development already in the immediate area the addition of what might be as many as 600-800 new residents will have a significant impact on local services such as Schools, GPs, dentists & other medical services.  No provision is being made for this in the proposed development and the likelihood of any S105 monies being able to address them in the immediate area are negligible.  In the relatively recent past studies and investigations have shown that

  • The Brentwood & Basildon CCG has one of the worst levels of GP provision in England & Wales (BBC),
  • The 4 local primary schools are up to 3 times oversubscribed.  (Essex Live)

Mental Health & Wellbeing

The UKHSA has said that

We’ve known for some time that good quality natural landscape in urban areas can affect how people feel. It reduces stress and sadness, lifts the mood and makes us feel better.  The benefit of these green and blue spaces, and the mechanisms by which they work, are varied. 

Pilgrims Hatch & Brentwood are urban areas and this proposed development is on one of the few natural landscapes in our area.

Water, Drainage & Flood Risk

As the Climate changes we are already experiencing more ‘extreme’ weather events with increasing incidences of heavy rain in particular.  The Met Office believes that, by 2070, winters will be up to 30% wetter than previously with storm conditions already more than 40% more likely.  Residents I have heard from near the site have experienced raw sewage in flood water in recent years.

The proposed development is on top of a Critical Drainage Area with some natural watercourses and high potential to absorb moisture.  With much of the area being covered by roads and buildings, this resource will be lost and could impact on neighbouring properties and, indeed, possibly Doddinghurst Road as run off from the site.

Wildlife

The site has diverse wildlife as mentioned earlier.  In particular there are three species of nesting bats (Natterer’s, Noctule & Pipistrelle) and badgers, all protected species.  The proposal to relocate the known badger sett to an artificial one near the A12 is inappropriate both in terms of removing them from their natural environment and in terms of putting them in harms way.  It is also inconsistent with the provisions of the Protection of Badgers Act 1992 which, inter alia, makes it an offence to:

  • intentionally or recklessly damage or destroy a badger sett or obstruct access to it,
  • disturb a badger when it is occupying its sett.

Consideration should also be given to crops’ reliance on butterflies, wasps, bees and other species for pollination.  The ‘horses field’, as we have come to know it, offers significant levels of opportunities for these species to thrive and service our local agriculture.

Noise

The noise levels from the A12 will not improve (especially with heavier cars creating more noise than lighter ones), and with the best will in the world, those who might come to live in the new development, should it be built, will find the noise levels to be excessive.

Countryside Apply For Planning

It’s getting real – the Planning Application is in

Planning Notice for Countryside Developments plans for 182 new homes on the Horse's field.

Countryside Properties have put in their planning application and Brentwood Borough Council issued their Planning Notice on 4th September 2024. The Council have designated the development as a ‘Major Development’ .

To view the application you need to visit:

Once there, enter the Application Number which is 24/00864/FUL and spend a leisurely week or so viewing all 132 Documents, 7 Constraints and 1 Related Case!

How to Comment or Object

You can either register your comments online or in writing.

  • Using the link above click on ‘Comments’ and follow the instructions (see Guidance Notes below on the ‘rules’ you must follow).
  • Alternatively you can send a letter to
    The Planning Officer,
    Town Hall,
    Ingrave Road,
    Brentwood,
    CM15 8AY.

Guidance on Responses

The following is lifted directly from BBC’s website:

We will note all comments and publish them on our website for public viewing. Your name, address and comment will be displayed.

  • You must include your name and address with your comments (we accept e-mail addresses, so we have a way to contact you regarding your comments if required). We can’t accept confidential or anonymous comments.
  • You must not include any other personal information in your comments.
  • When making a comment, make sure that it is not offensive, harmful or untrue. If it is, your comment will be removed from the website. You’re responsible for any statements that you make.
  • Views expressed by third parties on our website are not the views of Brentwood Borough Council.

If you need to include information that shouldn’t be public, make sure you highlight this at the beginning of your comment and we will remove it before the letter is published.

We can’t respond to individual comments, but you can track the progress of the planning application on the planning register.

You must have an online account with the Council. If you haven’t already registered or logged in, you will be prompted to before you can leave your comments. Appropriate checks will be made to ensure the authenticity of online accounts and comments posted. Any accounts or comments found to be fraudulent will be removed.

If your comments are lengthy, we advise you to type them into a word processor first then paste them into the comments form.

What should my comments include?

Your comments can only be properly considered if you give reasons which relate to the planning application and to planning matters.

When considering a planning application, it’s not whether owners and tenants of nearby properties would experience financial or other loss from a development, but whether the proposal would affect the local buildings and facilities as well as the existing use of land and buildings which should be protected.

Planning applications will be judged in accordance with adopted development plan documents unless there are relevant planning considerations which suggest otherwise.  

Issues that are considered relevant in planning decisions

  • Local development framework
  • Development plan documents
  • Supplementary planning documents
  • The Statement of Community Involvement
  • The annual monitoring report
  • Government planning guidance
  • The Council’s corporate policies
  • Highway safety and traffic levels
  • Noise, disturbance and smells resulting from the proposed development
  • Design, appearance and layout
  • Conservation of buildings, trees and open land
  • Flood risk
  • Impact on the appearance of the area
  • Effect on the level of daylight and privacy of existing property
  • Need to safeguard the countryside or protected species of plant or animal
  • Planning case law and previous decisions
  • The need for the development
  • The planning history of the site

Planning considerations which are not relevant

  • Private property rights such as covenants
  • The developer’s identity, morals or motives
  • Effect on the value of your property
  • Loss of a private view
  • Private neighbour disputes

Countryside Have Woken Up

Countryside Flyer P1 April 2024
Bigger version below

Countryside has sent letters to many addresses close to the proposed development areas. They include a glossy flyer extolling the virtues of their proposals which they seem to be considering putting to the council shortly. The letter tells us of a ‘drop-in’ event they are holding at Brentwood Town FC on 17th April. Local councillors have said that this inappropriate in the middle of a local election campaign. Accordingly they have approached Countryside to ask for the event to be postponed until after the May elections.

In case you didn’t get one of these letters, you can see their snazzy flyer below, they beg many questions, some we have discussed on these pages in the past but some new ones are posed such as:

Continue reading “Countryside Have Woken Up”

Fundraising Update

Fundraising - lots of money needed

Fundraising is critical to our chances of fighting off this proposed development. Thank you to those who have already donated, our current balance is growing but we really do need more.

Members are doing as much as they can to research issues and options (this website being a window on some of that), but there will come a time when we need to engage experts. For example, if we need legal opinion that costs a whopping £3,000 per day.

Quiz Night & Fundraising

Continue reading “Fundraising Update”

Is Government Policy Changing?

Planning Policy Has Caused This – Can a Change Reverse It?

Greenbelt development should be against policy
Greenbelt development

Maria Caulfield, Conservative MP for Lewes, recently penned an article that raises some interesting thoughts on planning policy:

  • There is an apparent recognition that the numbers required may well be excessive and will need to be revised, and
  • Also a firming up on the need to develop brown belt land before green field is taken.

Continue reading “Is Government Policy Changing?”

Why are people signing the petition?

Reasons folks are giving for signing

Because its green belt. The loss of that land is not good for the environment and wildlife. Also not good for the over development of Brentwood as too much congestion and pollution. Go build on brown land and stop ruining the natural habitat to so many wildlife animals and different trees that are flourishing there.

Jennifer

It is a lovely Enclave of Wild life , including Adders and Badgers, and people travel miles to see the New Foals every year. My neighbour and friend has has planning rejected several times because his plans will down grade the sight of the estate , and yet you will throw up 260 house full of all sorts probably with minimal car parking.

Mark

We cannot afford to lose our Open spaces or woodland not just from an ecological position but a health and mental health position. Houses mean extra traffic on the roads, congestion and pollution. Doctors surgeries and dentists are closing their books because they are at capacity so where will these new patients get registered? Schools, do they have room available to accommodate an influx of new students?

Rebecca

Already far too much congestion along Doddinghurst Road & Ongar Roads throughout the day and quite simple the infrastructure is SHOCKING over a month to get an appointment with a doctor!! NO NHS dentists!!! One supermarket?? Come on… it is ridiculous even suggesting it!!!

Amy

Disgraceful attempt to squeeze housing into an over populated area, increasing noise and pollution in the area from the A12 with the loss of the trees screening the area. No new doctors, schools will be built and the roads are already gridlocked.

David

The borough’s infrastructure cannot take any more homes in quantity like this. You cannot get a doctor or dentist as it is. Vehicles in Doddinghurst Road would be adding to an already congested Ongar Road and High Street.

Peter

Part of the beauty of Pilgrims Hatch and surrounding areas is the nature and greenery. Both my children enjoy walking and seeing the horses and wildlife where the proposed site is, something that is fun and free and educational for them to do, which is very rare to find these days. Plus, our local schools are already over demanded, the traffic in Brentwood is laughable with how atrocious it is and this development will make it far worse, along with noise pollution.

Kelly

The infrastructure in the surrounding areas cannot cope with this number of additional houses, roads are already busy enough and all schools in the area fully populated. Additional 300 vehicles on the road from these developments alone?

Paul

I see this field each day and every day I see an array of wildlife enjoying the field, it attracts so many species of wildlife, flora and fauna, badgers, so many species of birds, including even herons! And I have even seen our beloved endangered hedgehogs. The environmental impact will be devastating to Brentwood, reducing our air quality, by taking away another green space. The amount of extra cars on the road from the new homes would create even more pollution and even heavier traffic, adding more pressure to our already overloaded infrastructure and local services. The Ongar and Doddinghurst Roads are already gridlocked most parts of the day. It will not only have a detrimental affect on our environment but will also affect peoples mental health. We need our green spaces.

Lisa

The total and inevitable destruction of all open land in all towns. The removal of spaces, whether private or public, that people can see and enjoy the openess, whether they want to or not. The fact that it is there, no houses, no industrial buildings, just what it is, nature, to be enjoyed. The clear objective of developers putting profit over the health, both physical and mental, and completely ignoring the well-being of anybody that lives in these towns. Wildlife being eradicated for the rest of time in these areas, and never to return. And clearly the further ramifications caused by the strain on the schools, medical services, police and other services that clearly cannot cope at this time. I fear that this town, like many others will be engulfed by the going cancer that is London in the coming years.

Peter

The roads around this particular area are already very congested during the rush hour and school hours making it difficult for people travelling into Brentwood from Pilgrims Hatch, Doddinghurst & Kelvedon Hatch. An additional 400 cars would make this an absolute nightmare. Any commuters living this side of Brentwood trying to get to either Shenfield or Brentwood Stations in the morning already have a difficult enough journey. This will just gridlock this side of town. I also object to the loss of yet another green area. A lot of people get enjoyment from seeing the horses on these fields.

Jackie

Building on pasture and wood land untouched to wildlife for years, if ever. Badger and Fox sets are on the land and have seen a Muntjac running around. Birds that come into our garden nest in the trees and, i suspect, the newts that lay eggs and spend spring in my pond live there during the winter. In a time when changes in the environment are affecting wildlife species throughout the world this shows why government and local authorities really don’t care about this issue.

Neil

We don’t have the infrastructure for that many more houses! Our schools are full, you can’t get to see a doctor, the road are always congested. We can’t take all those extra houses. This is the first I’ve heard about this development and it’s on my doorstep!

Rowena

If it goes ahead this planned development will be disastrous for all living in the local area, replacing space providing enjoyment with an environment which puts impossible strain on a massively overstretched local infrastructure.

Douglas

This is green belt land. We chose to live here because of the open green spaces. The infrastructure is not there to support the current residents in the area let alone another 200 homes. Due to the number of residents the local GP surgeries have so many patients on their books the wait time to speak to your Dr is over 3 weeks, dentists are not accepting new patients including current residents, the roads in the surrounding area become gridlocked on a regular basis, there are not enough spaces for children to attend local nurseries, pre schools, schools.

Nicki

The roads around this area are already congested especially Doddinghurst and Ongar Roads around school times. It’s extremely difficult to get a doctors appointment at present, where are all these additional households going to get registered. The infrastructure can’t cope with all the additional planned dwellings.

Mike

There is already an unhealthy amount of traffic congestion on the Ongar and Doddinghurst Roads, which can come to a stand still. Our doctor surgeries in particular, are at full stretch with long waiting lists for appointments. Our schools are also under pressure. I feel our infrastructure can’t cope with additional population.

Ann

Increased traffic and congestion, knocking down of healthy trees, building on land that is home to wildlife and also greenbelt land. Extra strain on local GP surgeries, and schools.

Stacey

I object to the cutting down of a well established woodland that has lots of species of trees, plants, animals, insects and birds that live there including our badgers. It is rich with biodiversity. The fact that it helps with noise pollution and air pollution something that will become even worse for us living here and for any new residents. Natural habitats such as these should be cherished not ripped down. The wild fields the other side of the A12 are also rich with biodiversity including badgers and different wild plant species, we should be protecting wild meadows in our towns. Both sites also have other problems including but not limited to dangerous proposed entrances to the sites on a busy blind corner of Doddinghurst Road, the lack of schools for the proposed houses – schools are already oversubscribed in this area, the lack of doctors and the increased traffic and cut throughs that this will create.

Natalie

The impact it will have on our health and the environment is unimaginable. The roads are already congested and there isn’t enough doctors and dentists to support those who live here already.

Lisa

The area belongs to the wildlife, the trees and fields help to suck some of pollution caused by the A12. The traffic is already horrendous, parking is a nightmare, the roads were not designed for this many cars without adding at least another 800 on top of this. There other other sites in Brentwood that have been waiting for planning permission for years, that have already been concreted over, focus on those and not destroying wildlife.

Chloe

Pollution, wildlife, trees, congestion of traffic even more than it is now. Doctors, schools.

Elaine

Traffic will be horrendous, more pollution, fumes etc not good for our health. These fields are a haven for our wildlife, keep our green spaces for local people to view.

Joanne

More pollution, strain on schools, surgeries, wildlife being destroyed, Brentwood cannot cope with the population it already has.

Angela

I object due to the massive negative effect on the biodiversity of the area if these small pockets are built on. I object to the lack of infrastructure in place in Brentwood to deal with any more traffic or people, schools, doctors, dentists, roads, supermarkets etc. The negative affect on the already dangerous air quality. The loss of natural calming beauty in a world where we should be adding more not taking it away. The already ridiculous drainage and sewage issues. The badger sets, the bats, the deer the green and blue corridor that local wildlife would lose and the obvious disregard for greenbelt which is vital for future generations. The noise pollution from the a12. The aesthetics of the area.

Philip

The impact on wildlife is outrageous and more traffic in an already over congested area will be horrific. Local infrastructure i.e. schools doctors surgery’s etc etc is insufficient and added parking insufficient. Pollution damage to local peoples health is a large factor too.

Joanne

Not everybody signing leaves a comment but many do, as of late July, some of the most frequently mentioned issues were:

  • Green(ery/belt) – 35%
  • Wildlife – 26%
  • Pollution – 24%
  • Traffic – 23%
  • Schools – 18%

Press Article – Issued 27th May

On 27th May we issued a Press Release to local media as follows:

Developers Threaten Our Environment – Within Days!

Image submitted to Press

The Local Development Plan recently adopted by Brentwood Borough Council has put valuable Green Belt Land under direct threat.  Developers are already swooping in to capitalise on this.  Residents in one area listed as being suitable for development have already had warning letters from developers. 

These letters, possibly quite reasonably, ask them to remove any property from the green-belt land. They give a deadline of 31st May after which they will clear the land!  This land is home to several badger families, nesting birds and bats; there is also a wide diversity of flora from the smallest wildflowers to large established trees. Some nearby gardens even report occasional Great Crested Newts visiting their fish ponds!  This level of biodiversity takes decades to achieve and yet could be scraped away in just a few days’ time.

Why Does This Matter

This ‘site’, actually two discrete sites straddling the A12, is listed for 200 homes but at what expense? The adjacent, already developed, area already has amongst the poorest air-quality in Brentwood. Removal of the green belt land will take away what is, effectively, a green lung.  If developed this site will extend one of only a few Air Quality Management Areas recognised by the local Council*.

So, this new potential development area will suffer even higher levels of pollution than those experienced by current residents.  This is tantamount to consigning many to an early death due to chronic health issues caused by air pollution; how many more death certificates are we to expect citing pollution as a contributory factor?

*Brentwood AQMA No. 4.

This seems to have prompted EssexLive (aka Gazette) to visit our website…

From which they published the following on 2nd June:

Residents claim new 200 homes near A12 on Brentwood green belt land will impact their health

Image submitted to Press
Residents say the land astride the A12 is host to a rich variety of wildlife

Residents say developing 200 homes on green belt land in Brentwood would harm wildlife and create further congestion in the surrounding roads. A petition has now been set up following Brentwood’s local plan that has in principle approved the building of 200 homes on land designated as “Site R16” which actually comprises two parcels separated by the A12.

The northern parcel is situated to the south of Pilgrims Hatch and the southern parcel is to the north of Brentwood. Both parcels adjoin existing residential dwellings on two boundaries. The site will provide for around 200 homes, anticipated to be delivered between 2022/23 and 2025/26.

The development is expected to provide a mix of size and type of homes. One field is known colloquially as ‘Horses Field’ on the Pilgrims Hatch side and the other is a diverse woodland with Oak, Ash, Birch, Hornbeam, Goat Willow and Poplar which residents say supports a rich variety of wildlife.

A statement on a petition page supporting the opposition to the plan said: “The two sites offer a rich diversity of environment and are home to many species including badgers, foxes and deer and horses. The wooded area has open glades, shrubs and a variety of trees including Oak, Ash, Birch, Hornbeam, Goat Willow and Poplar. These provide both a noise and air quality ‘buffer’. They are also key elements of a sustainable ecology.

“Once developed, it is inevitable that the current Air Quality Management Area which covers parts of Warescot Road, Ongar Road and Hurstwood Avenue will expand to include the new development. Pollution levels associated with, probably, another 400 cars will increase. The potential impact on health of the residents and children living and walking through the area is unimaginable.”

The land was formally designated for housing in March when Brentwood Council signed off where nearly more than 7,000 homes should be built across Brentwood.

Altogether Brentwood Borough Council’s local plan sets out where 7,146 homes are to be built between 2016 and 2033 – a total of 2,447 homes have already been designated through completions, extant permissions or windfall developments. That leaves 4,699 across a number of sites across the borough such as the development in site R16.

A statement as part of the local plan associated with this designation said: “The site will provide for around 200 homes, anticipated to be delivered between 2022/23 and 2025/26. It will provide a mix of size and type of homes including affordable in accordance with the Council’s policy requirements. The development will take its main vehicular access from Doddinghurst Road.

It will be expected to adequately mitigate its likely impacts on the performance of the local and strategic road network. Opportunities to create improved connections should be maximised to create a development where alternative forms of transport to the private car (walking, cycling and public transport) are prioritised. New and enhanced pedestrian and cycle connections will be expected to be provided within the site and to the wider area.

As the site is located within a Critical Drainage Area early consultation with the Lead Local Flood Authority (Essex County Council) will be required to determine appropriate mitigation which should be incorporated into the overall design of the scheme.

In the Print Edition This Month

Gazette Article June 8th 2022
June 8th 2022

And over 30 years ago…

Gazette article 19th August 1988
August 19th 1988